Skip to content

Banach’s Fixed Point Theorem

Theorem: The theorem also known as the contraction mapping theorem, states that if a function \(\tau\) is a contraction mapping on a complete metric space \((X,d)\), then \(\tau\) has a unique fixed point in \(X\).

We approach the proof by first defining the contraction mapping, and then using an iterative method to show the existence of a fixed point.

Some Preliminaries

Contraction: A function \(\tau: X \mapsto X\) is a contraction mapping on a metric space \((X,d)\) if there exists a constant \(0 < k < 1\) such that \(\forall\) \(x,y \in X\):

\[ d(\tau(x),\tau(y)) \leq kd(x,y) \]

Complete Metric Space: A metric space \((X,d)\) is complete if every Cauchy sequence in \(X\) converges to a point in \(X\).

Cauchy Sequence: A sequence \((x_n)\) in a metric space \((X,d)\) is a Cauchy sequence if \(\forall\) \(\epsilon > 0\), \(\exists\) \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(\forall\) \(m,n \geq N\):

\[ d(x_m,x_n) < \epsilon \]

Proof

Let \((X,d)\) be a complete metric space and \(\tau: X \mapsto X\) be a contraction mapping on \(X\). We will show that \(\tau\) has a unique fixed point in \(X\) ie. \(\exists\) \(x^* \in X\) such that \(\tau(x^*) = x^*\).

We can define an iterative process as follows:

$ x^{(0)} \in X \ x^{(n+1)} = \tau(x^{(n)}) \quad \forall n \in \mathbb{N}\ $

Hence we obtain asequence {\(x^{(n)}\)} in \(X\). We need to show that this sequence converges. Since the sequence is in a complete metric space, it is enough to show that this sequence is Cauchy.

\[ \begin{aligned} d(x^{n}, x^{n+1}) &= d(\tau(x^{(n-1)}), \tau(x^{(n)}))\\ &\leq kd(x^{(n-1)}, x^{(n)})\\ &\leq k^2d(x^{(n-2)}, x^{(n-1)})\\ &\vdots\\ &\leq k^nd(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)})\\ \end{aligned} \]

Now by the triangular inequality we can see that:

\[ \begin{aligned} d(x^{(m)}, x^{(n)}) &\leq d(x^{(m)}, x^{(m+1)}) + d(x^{(m+1)}, x^{(m+2)}) + \dots + d(x^{(n-1)}, x^{(n)})\\ &\leq k^md(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)}) + k^{m+1}d(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)}) + \dots + k^{n-1}d(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)})\\ &= k^md(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)})\sum_{i=0}^{n-m-1}k^i\\ &= k^md(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)})\frac{1-k^{n-m}}{1-k}\\ &\leq \frac{k^md(x^{(0)}, x^{(1)})}{1-k}\\ \end{aligned} \]

Since \(0 < K < 1\) we can choose \(m\) sufficiently large such that \(d(x^{m}, x^{n})\) is small, and hence the sequence is Cauchy.

Finally, since the sequence is Cauchy, it converges to a point \(x \in X\), ie.   \(x^{(n)} \xrightarrow{} x\)

We now need to show that this point is a fixed point.

\[ \begin{aligned} d(x,\tau(x)) &\leq d(x,x^{(n)}) + d(x^{(n)}, \tau(x))\\ &= d(x,x^{(n)}) + d(\tau(x^{(n-1)}), \tau(x))\\ &\leq d(x,x^{(n)}) + Kd(x^{(n-1)}, x)\\ \end{aligned} \]

Since the sequence converges to \(x\),   \(d(x,\tau(x)) \leq 0\) and hence \(x = \tau(x)\).

Finally, we need to show that this fixed point is unique. Suppose there exists another fixed point \(y \in X\) such that \(y = \tau(y)\). Then:

\[ \begin{aligned} d(x,y) &= d(\tau(x), \tau(y))\\ &\leq Kd(x,y)\\ \end{aligned} \]

This implies \(d(x,y) = 0\) and hence \(x = y\) since \(0 < K < 1\)

Hence we have shown that the sequence of approximations converges to a point that is the fixed point, and that this fixed point is unique.

This completes the proof.